Standard Life Assurance Ltd v Oak Dedicated Ltd & Ors
The words 'each and every claim and/or claimant' in the policy excess provision impose a per claimant excess, precluding aggregation of related claims by different claimants. Aon was negligent in arranging cover with ambiguous and non-standard wording that failed to clearly meet SLAC's requirements. The Part VII transfer was effective to vest rights of action in SLAL. There was no contributory negligence by SLAC and the claim was not time-barred.
- Parties
- Claimant / Part 20 Claimant: Standard Life Assurance Limited; Defendants: Oak Dedicated Limited and others; Part 20 Defendant: Aon Limited (formerly Aon Group Limited); Part 20 Defendant: Reynolds Porter Chamberlain (a firm)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Dispute (professional Indemnity) / Judgment After Stage 1 Trial on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Judgment for Defendants (Insurers) on construction; Judgment for Claimant (SLAL) against Aon on negligence; SLAL entitled to pursue claim for damages against Aon; SLAL has title to sue; No reduction for contributory negligence; Claim not time-barred.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Insurance Contracts, Aggregation of Claims, Broker's Duty of Care, Assignment of Rights Under Insurance Policies, Limitation of Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Life Assurance Limited
Claimant / Part 20 Claimant
Oak Dedicated Limited and others
Defendants
Aon Limited (formerly Aon Group Limited)
Part 20 Defendant
Reynolds Porter Chamberlain (a firm)
Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Dispute (professional Indemnity) / Judgment After Stage 1 Trial on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the policy wording 'each and every claim and/or claimant' imposes a per claim or per claimant excess
- 2 Whether Aon was negligent in arranging cover with ambiguous wording
- 3 Whether SLAL has title to sue following the Part VII transfer
Ratio Decidendi
The words 'each and every claim and/or claimant' in the policy excess provision impose a per claimant excess, precluding aggregation of related claims by different claimants. Aon was negligent in arranging cover with ambiguous and non-standard wording that failed to clearly meet SLAC's requirements. The Part VII transfer was effective to vest rights of action in SLAL. There was no contributory negligence by SLAC and the claim was not time-barred.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Defendants (Insurers) on construction; Judgment for Claimant (SLAL) against Aon on negligence; SLAL entitled to pursue claim for damages against Aon; SLAL has title to sue; No reduction for contributory negligence; Claim not time-barred.
Orders
- Declaration that the policy does not permit aggregation of related claims by different claimants for the purpose of the excess.
- Declaration that Aon was negligent in arranging the 1998-2001 cover.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment