Britvic Plc v Britvic Pensions Ltd & Anor
The alteration power in rule C10(2) of the Britvic Pension Plan allows the principal employer to substitute only a higher rate of increase, not a lower rate, for defined benefit pensions in payment and deferred benefits. The phrase 'any other rate' is interpreted purposively, in light of the scheme's context, legislative background, and admissible documents, to mean 'any other higher rate.' The trustee must apply the default capped RPI rate unless the employer directs a higher rate. The same construction applies to rule C2(2) for revaluation of deferred pensions, and the employer may not set different rates for revaluation and pension increases except for pre- and post-2008 accrual caps.
- Parties
- Claimant: Britvic Plc; First Defendant: Britvic Pensions Limited; Second Defendant: Simon Richard Mohun
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim / Substantive Hearing, Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaratory judgment in favour of representative beneficiary's construction; employer's wider interpretation rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Pension Scheme Rules, Interpretation of Alteration Power, Statutory Minimum Increases, Revaluation of Deferred Benefits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Britvic Plc
Claimant
Britvic Pensions Limited
First Defendant
Simon Richard Mohun
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim / Substantive Hearing, Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the alteration power in rule C10(2) allows the principal employer to substitute any rate (higher or lower) or only a higher rate
- 2 Whether the principal employer may set different rates for revaluation of deferred pensions under rule C2(2) than for increases to pensions in payment under rule C10(2)
Ratio Decidendi
The alteration power in rule C10(2) of the Britvic Pension Plan allows the principal employer to substitute only a higher rate of increase, not a lower rate, for defined benefit pensions in payment and deferred benefits. The phrase 'any other rate' is interpreted purposively, in light of the scheme's context, legislative background, and admissible documents, to mean 'any other higher rate.' The trustee must apply the default capped RPI rate unless the employer directs a higher rate. The same construction applies to rule C2(2) for revaluation of deferred pensions, and the employer may not set different rates for revaluation and pension increases except for pre- and post-2008 accrual caps.
Court Disposition
Declaratory judgment in favour of representative beneficiary's construction; employer's wider interpretation rejected.
Orders
- Declaration that on any 1 October, the trustee must increase pensions to which rules C10(2) and C2(2) apply by the default rate in the absence of any direction by the employer to increase at a higher rate.
- Declaration that the employer may only direct a higher rate, not a lower rate, under rule C10(2).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment