Yeoman's Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrick [2002] EWCA Civ 860 (30 May 2002)
Clause 2(20) of the tenancy agreement does not entitle the landlord to carry out improvements to the flat; the landlord's right is limited to repairs and works akin to repairs, and must be construed in light of the covenant for quiet enjoyment.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 860
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Yeoman's Row Management Limited; Defendant/respondent: Bodentien-Meyrick
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Tenancy Agreement, Repair and Improvement Obligations, Quiet Enjoyment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yeoman's Row Management Limited
Claimant/appellant
Bodentien-Meyrick
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 2(20) of the tenancy agreement entitles the landlord to carry out improvements as well as repairs
- 2 Extent of landlord's right to enter and execute works under the tenancy agreement
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 2(20) of the tenancy agreement does not entitle the landlord to carry out improvements to the flat; the landlord's right is limited to repairs and works akin to repairs, and must be construed in light of the covenant for quiet enjoyment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs summarily assessed at £3,500 payable within 14 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment