Berry & Anor v IBS-STL (UK) Ltd & Anor
Section 75F does not apply because the will only benefits charities in existence at the testatrix's death, and IBS had ceased to exist by then. The sixth share is not a gift to IBS and must be distributed at the trustees' discretion under Clause 6.3.
- Parties
- Claimant: Simon Anthony Berry; Claimant: Paul Archer; First Defendant: IBS-STL (UK) Limited (in liquidation); Second Defendant: Her Majesty’s Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/charity / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; trustees may exercise discretion under Clause 6.3.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Will, Charity Merger, Application of Charities Act, Trustee Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Anthony Berry
Claimant
Paul Archer
Claimant
IBS-STL (UK) Limited (in liquidation)
First Defendant
Her Majesty’s Attorney General
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/charity / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 75F of the Charities Act 1993 applies to the residuary gift in the will
- 2 Whether the trustees must pay the share to the merged charity or exercise discretion under Clause 6.3 of the will
Ratio Decidendi
Section 75F does not apply because the will only benefits charities in existence at the testatrix's death, and IBS had ceased to exist by then. The sixth share is not a gift to IBS and must be distributed at the trustees' discretion under Clause 6.3.
Court Disposition
Application granted; trustees may exercise discretion under Clause 6.3.
Orders
- Court approves trustees' proposed distribution of the sixth share to substitute charities.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment