Cape Industrial Services Ltd v Patricia Ambler [2002] EWCA Civ 1264 (26 July 2002)
The Court of Appeal held that Cape's grounds of appeal regarding the change in staff responsibilities and the handling of the grievance raised reasonably arguable points of law and should be allowed to proceed to a full hearing before the EAT.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1264
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Cape Industrial Services Limited; Respondent/appellant: Patricia Ambler
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Implied Term of Trust and Confidence, Grievance Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cape Industrial Services Limited
Appellant/respondent
Patricia Ambler
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in finding a fundamental breach of contract based on change in staff responsibilities
- 2 Whether the handling of the grievance constituted a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that Cape's grounds of appeal regarding the change in staff responsibilities and the handling of the grievance raised reasonably arguable points of law and should be allowed to proceed to a full hearing before the EAT.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Cape's appeal to the EAT to proceed on two additional grounds: (1) change in responsibilities for staff, and (2) handling of grievance, in addition to the ground already allowed by the EAT
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment