Hassan Kadhim Ali v Amar Hussain

Hassan Kadhim Ali v Amar Hussain

Permission to Re-Re-Amend Particulars of Claim is granted only for amendments that clarify legal claims, are not contradictory, are properly particularised, and have a real prospect of success. Amendments alleging contradictory factual positions, proprietary estoppel against non-owners, and claims for equitable compensation for breach of fiduciary duty are refused. Amendments regarding directorship, shareholding, and duties to account are allowed where properly pleaded. Costs caused by amendments are ordered to be paid by the Claimant.

Parties
Claimant: Hassan Kadhim Ali; 1st Defendant: Amar Hussain; 2nd Defendant: Autotrade London Limited; 3rd Defendant: AFH Properties Limited; 4th Defendant: 185 Park Avenue Limited; 5th Defendant: Amal Reda; 6th Defendant: Anwar Ghaleb (also called Anor Galb Ahmed Almosoy); 7th Defendant: Mr Falah Abdulhussein Radhi Alhilfi
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application for Permission to Re Re Amend Particulars of Claim
Outcome
Application for permission to Re-Re-Amend Particulars of Claim partly allowed, partly refused.
Legal Topics
Constructive Trust, Beneficial Ownership, Fiduciary Duty, Derivative Claims, Proprietary Estoppel, Amendment of Pleadings, Directorship and Shareholding, Breach of Trust, Negligence, Equitable Compensation
Trusts Property Company Law Civil Procedure Constructive Trust Beneficial Ownership Fiduciary Duty Derivative Claims +6 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 16
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hassan Kadhim Ali

Claimant

Amar Hussain

1st Defendant

Autotrade London Limited

2nd Defendant

AFH Properties Limited

3rd Defendant

185 Park Avenue Limited

4th Defendant

Amal Reda

5th Defendant

Anwar Ghaleb (also called Anor Galb Ahmed Almosoy)

6th Defendant

Mr Falah Abdulhussein Radhi Alhilfi

7th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ruling on Application for Permission to Re Re Amend Particulars of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission should be granted to Re-Re-Amend Particulars of Claim
  2. 2 Whether contradictory factual positions can be pleaded
  3. 3 Whether proprietary estoppel claims can be maintained against non-owners

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to Re-Re-Amend Particulars of Claim is granted only for amendments that clarify legal claims, are not contradictory, are properly particularised, and have a real prospect of success. Amendments alleging contradictory factual positions, proprietary estoppel against non-owners, and claims for equitable compensation for breach of fiduciary duty are refused. Amendments regarding directorship, shareholding, and duties to account are allowed where properly pleaded. Costs caused by amendments are ordered to be paid by the Claimant.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to Re-Re-Amend Particulars of Claim partly allowed, partly refused.

Orders

  • Permission granted for amendments clarifying directorship, shareholding, and duties to account.
  • Permission refused for amendments alleging contradictory factual positions, proprietary estoppel against non-owners, and equitable compensation for breach of fiduciary duty.