Negus v Gordon Charles Bahouse & Anor [2007] EWHC 2628 (Ch) (23 October 2007)

Negus v Gordon Charles Bahouse & Anor [2007] EWHC 2628 (Ch) (23 October 2007)

Ms Negus failed to establish a beneficial interest in Flat 8 as there was no sufficient agreement or assurance to support a constructive trust or proprietary estoppel. However, the will did not make reasonable financial provision for her maintenance as a cohabitee, given her lifestyle with the deceased and her needs, so an award of Flat 8 mortgage-free plus a capital sum of £240,000 was appropriate under the 1975 Act.

Citation
[2007] EWHC 2628 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Cyd Negus; Defendant/executor: Gordon Charles Bahouse; Defendant/executor: Patricia Bahouse
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Probate/inheritance/trusts / Judgment After Trial of Consolidated Claims
Outcome
Claim for beneficial interest in Flat 8 dismissed; claim for reasonable financial provision under the 1975 Act allowed.
Legal Topics
Constructive Trusts, Proprietary Estoppel, Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, Beneficial Interest in Property, Reasonable Financial Provision, Cohabitee Claims
Trusts and Estates Family Law Property Law Constructive Trusts Proprietary Estoppel Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 Beneficial Interest in Property Reasonable Financial Provision +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 15
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cyd Negus

Claimant

Gordon Charles Bahouse

Defendant/executor

Patricia Bahouse

Defendant/executor

Procedural Posture

Chancery Division Probate/inheritance/trusts / Judgment After Trial of Consolidated Claims

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Ms Negus has a beneficial interest in Flat 8 under a constructive trust or proprietary estoppel
  2. 2 Whether the deceased's will failed to make reasonable financial provision for Ms Negus under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975

Ratio Decidendi

Ms Negus failed to establish a beneficial interest in Flat 8 as there was no sufficient agreement or assurance to support a constructive trust or proprietary estoppel. However, the will did not make reasonable financial provision for her maintenance as a cohabitee, given her lifestyle with the deceased and her needs, so an award of Flat 8 mortgage-free plus a capital sum of £240,000 was appropriate under the 1975 Act.

Court Disposition

Claim for beneficial interest in Flat 8 dismissed; claim for reasonable financial provision under the 1975 Act allowed.

Orders

  • Flat 8 to be transferred to Ms Negus free of mortgage or with sufficient funds to discharge the mortgage.
  • Ms Negus to be paid a capital sum of £240,000 (including £40,000 for repairs, less £5,000 already paid).