Singh v Singh & Anor [2014] EWHC 1060 (Ch) (08 April 2014)

Singh v Singh & Anor [2014] EWHC 1060 (Ch) (08 April 2014)

There was no common understanding between the claimant and defendants that property acquired and legally owned by them would be subject to joint Hindu family property principles as alleged. Accordingly, no constructive trust arose under English law, and the property in question is not held subject to such a trust.

Citation
[2014] EWHC 1060 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Bal Mohinder Singh; First Defendant: Jasminder Singh; Second Defendant: Herinder Singh
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Outcome
Claim dismissed on preliminary issues
Legal Topics
Constructive Trusts, Common Intention, Hindu Joint Family Property, Mitakshara Law, Beneficial Ownership

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bal Mohinder Singh

Claimant

Jasminder Singh

First Defendant

Herinder Singh

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Chancery Division Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a common understanding that property acquired by the claimant and defendants would be treated as joint Hindu family property under Mitakshara principles
  2. 2 Whether such property was held subject to a constructive trust under English law
  3. 3 What the terms of such trust were if it existed

Ratio Decidendi

There was no common understanding between the claimant and defendants that property acquired and legally owned by them would be subject to joint Hindu family property principles as alleged. Accordingly, no constructive trust arose under English law, and the property in question is not held subject to such a trust.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed on preliminary issues

Orders

  • No declaration of constructive trust
  • Property remains with legal owners