Singh v Singh & Anor [2014] EWHC 1060 (Ch) (08 April 2014)
There was no common understanding between the claimant and defendants that property acquired and legally owned by them would be subject to joint Hindu family property principles as alleged. Accordingly, no constructive trust arose under English law, and the property in question is not held subject to such a trust.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 1060 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Bal Mohinder Singh; First Defendant: Jasminder Singh; Second Defendant: Herinder Singh
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed on preliminary issues
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trusts, Common Intention, Hindu Joint Family Property, Mitakshara Law, Beneficial Ownership
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bal Mohinder Singh
Claimant
Jasminder Singh
First Defendant
Herinder Singh
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a common understanding that property acquired by the claimant and defendants would be treated as joint Hindu family property under Mitakshara principles
- 2 Whether such property was held subject to a constructive trust under English law
- 3 What the terms of such trust were if it existed
Ratio Decidendi
There was no common understanding between the claimant and defendants that property acquired and legally owned by them would be subject to joint Hindu family property principles as alleged. Accordingly, no constructive trust arose under English law, and the property in question is not held subject to such a trust.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed on preliminary issues
Orders
- No declaration of constructive trust
- Property remains with legal owners
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment