Capehorn v Harris [2015] EWCA Civ 955 (08 July 2015)
The judge erred by imputing an intention to the parties at the first stage of the constructive trust analysis rather than identifying an actual agreement. There was no actual agreement that Mr Harris should have a beneficial interest in Sunnyside Farm, 19 Beaumont Road, or the company shares. Therefore, Mr Harris's claim fails, and Mrs Capehorn is the sole legal and beneficial owner of the properties; Mr Harris is the sole owner of the company shares.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 955
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Linda Maureen Capehorn; Defendant/respondent: Michael Benjamin Harris
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trusts, Beneficial Interest, Unmarried Cohabitees, Division of Assets, Implied Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Linda Maureen Capehorn
Claimant/applicant
Michael Benjamin Harris
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Harris had a beneficial interest in Sunnyside Farm or 19 Beaumont Road
- 2 Whether Mrs Capehorn had a beneficial interest in shares of LMC Trade Sales Ltd
- 3 Whether the judge erred in law by imputing rather than inferring an agreement for beneficial interests
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred by imputing an intention to the parties at the first stage of the constructive trust analysis rather than identifying an actual agreement. There was no actual agreement that Mr Harris should have a beneficial interest in Sunnyside Farm, 19 Beaumont Road, or the company shares. Therefore, Mr Harris's claim fails, and Mrs Capehorn is the sole legal and beneficial owner of the properties; Mr Harris is the sole owner of the company shares.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mrs Capehorn's appeal allowed
- Mr Harris's cross-appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment