Middleweek v Collins Stewart Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 1179 (20 August 2004)
Permission to appeal is granted on the constructive dismissal and stigma damages claims because there are arguable points that may save significant time and costs if resolved, but refused on the issue of the solicitor's alleged lack of authority as it is a discrete point best left to trial.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 1179
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: James Middleweek; Defendant/applicant: Collins Stewart Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Stigma Damages, Amendment of Pleadings, Authority of Solicitor
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Middleweek
Claimant/respondent
Collins Stewart Limited
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted regarding amendments to claim for constructive dismissal and stigma damages
- 2 Whether the alleged blackmail was effected without claimant's authority
- 3 Whether stigma damages as a whistleblower are legally sustainable
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted on the constructive dismissal and stigma damages claims because there are arguable points that may save significant time and costs if resolved, but refused on the issue of the solicitor's alleged lack of authority as it is a discrete point best left to trial.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted in part
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted in relation to constructive dismissal claim and stigma damages claim
- Permission to appeal refused on the issue relating to absence of authority amendment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment