Middleweek v Collins Stewart Ltd

Middleweek v Collins Stewart Ltd

Permission to appeal is granted on the constructive dismissal and stigma damages claims because there are arguable points of law and fact that could significantly affect the scope and cost of the trial. The stigma damages claim, particularly as a whistleblower, is not well established in law and merits appellate consideration. Permission is refused on the amendment regarding the solicitor's lack of authority, as it is a discrete issue best left for trial.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: James Middleweek; Defendant/applicant: Collins Stewart Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 August 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court Decision
Outcome
Permission to appeal granted in part, refused in part
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Stigma Damages, Amendment of Pleadings, Breach of Contract
Employment Law Contract Law Constructive Dismissal Stigma Damages Amendment of Pleadings Breach of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Middleweek

Claimant/respondent

Collins Stewart Limited

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted regarding amendments to pleadings for constructive dismissal and stigma damages claims
  2. 2 Whether the claim for stigma damages as a whistleblower is sustainable
  3. 3 Whether the amendment regarding the solicitor's lack of authority should be allowed

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to appeal is granted on the constructive dismissal and stigma damages claims because there are arguable points of law and fact that could significantly affect the scope and cost of the trial. The stigma damages claim, particularly as a whistleblower, is not well established in law and merits appellate consideration. Permission is refused on the amendment regarding the solicitor's lack of authority, as it is a discrete issue best left for trial.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal granted in part, refused in part

Orders

  • Permission to appeal granted on constructive dismissal and stigma damages claims
  • Permission to appeal refused on the issue relating to the absence of authority amendment