Fairclough v Salmon [2006] EWCA Civ 320 (28 February 2006)
The beneficial ownership of the flat was held in equal shares by Mr John Salmon and Miss Fairclough as tenants in common from the time of acquisition, based on their oral agreement and joint responsibility for the mortgage and buy-out loan. Subsequent events, including the 1991 agreement and acquisition of the freehold, did not alter the trust or beneficial shares. Expenditure on refurbishment was accounted for by agreed deduction but did not affect the size of the beneficial interests.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 320
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Lynne Margaret Fairclough; First Defendant/appellant: John Stuart Salmon; Second Defendant/appellant: Richard Paul Salmon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal in the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trusts, Beneficial Ownership, Joint Tenancy and Tenancy in Common, Severance of Joint Tenancy, Resulting Trusts, Overriding Interests, Enforcement of Oral Agreements, Trusts of Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lynne Margaret Fairclough
Claimant/respondent
John Stuart Salmon
First Defendant/appellant
Richard Paul Salmon
Second Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal in the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the beneficial ownership of the flat was held in equal shares between the parties
- 2 Whether subsequent agreements or actions altered the beneficial interests
- 3 Whether the acquisition of the freehold or other events severed or varied the trust
Ratio Decidendi
The beneficial ownership of the flat was held in equal shares by Mr John Salmon and Miss Fairclough as tenants in common from the time of acquisition, based on their oral agreement and joint responsibility for the mortgage and buy-out loan. Subsequent events, including the 1991 agreement and acquisition of the freehold, did not alter the trust or beneficial shares. Expenditure on refurbishment was accounted for by agreed deduction but did not affect the size of the beneficial interests.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment