S (Children)
The trial judge was entitled to make the findings of fact he did based on the evidence and credibility assessments. The failure to specifically reference the expert evidence of Professor Beail did not undermine the judgment, as the judge was not required to follow expert opinion on issues of credibility. The appeal was dismissed as the findings were open to the judge on the evidence.
- Parties
- First Appellant Father: SR; Second Appellant Grandparents: MR and PA; Respondent Mother: TS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Permission to Appeal With Appeal to Follow
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contact Proceedings, Domestic Violence, Fact Finding Hearings, Credibility of Witnesses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SR
First Appellant Father
MR and PA
Second Appellant Grandparents
TS
Respondent Mother
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Permission to Appeal With Appeal to Follow
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in his findings of fact regarding domestic violence and the involvement of the paternal grandparents
- 2 Whether the judge failed to address or analyse the expert evidence of Professor Beail
- 3 Whether the judge was entitled to make the findings he did based on the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to make the findings of fact he did based on the evidence and credibility assessments. The failure to specifically reference the expert evidence of Professor Beail did not undermine the judgment, as the judge was not required to follow expert opinion on issues of credibility. The appeal was dismissed as the findings were open to the judge on the evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment