G (Children), Re [2002] EWCA Civ 1012 (27 May 2002)
The application for permission to appeal was dismissed as academic because the transcript was now available at public expense, rendering the original order requiring the father to pay for it moot.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1012
- Parties
- Applicant Father: Mr G; Respondent Mother: Mrs C
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (court of Appeal) From County Court Directions Order
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contact With Children, Appeals Procedure, Provision of Transcripts at Public Expense
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr G
Applicant Father
Mrs C
Respondent Mother
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (court of Appeal) From County Court Directions Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant father should be granted permission to appeal the County Court's directions order requiring him to obtain a transcript at his own expense
- 2 Whether transcripts should be provided at public expense for a publicly assisted litigant
- 3 Whether the appeal against the order for indirect contact should proceed without the transcript
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal was dismissed as academic because the transcript was now available at public expense, rendering the original order requiring the father to pay for it moot.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Copy of the transcript of this judgment to be provided to mother and father at public expense
- Copy of District Judge Wilson's judgment to be put on the County Court file
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment