Thompson v Mitchell [2004] EWCA Civ 1271 (23 August 2004)
The court has no power to make a sentencing order for contempt of court that overrides the early release provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 1991; the order specifying imprisonment until a fixed date was unlawful and must be amended to state a fixed term only.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 1271
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Emma Louise Thompson; Respondent/applicant: Steven Mitchell; Amicus Curiae: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Appeal Against Committal Order for Contempt of Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Sentencing, Early Release Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emma Louise Thompson
Claimant/respondent
Steven Mitchell
Respondent/applicant
Attorney General
Amicus Curiae
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal Against Committal Order for Contempt of Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a judge has jurisdiction to order that a contemnor be imprisoned until a specified date, overriding statutory early release provisions
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no power to make a sentencing order for contempt of court that overrides the early release provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 1991; the order specifying imprisonment until a fixed date was unlawful and must be amended to state a fixed term only.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of 2nd June amended to delete 'namely until 16 September 2004'; order to read 'committed for a total period of 128 days to Nottingham Prison'
- Revised order of 23rd July 2004 discharged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment