Loughran v Pandya

Loughran v Pandya

The original sentence of 2 years' imprisonment suspended for 2 years was manifestly excessive for the breaches found. An appropriate sentence is 8 months' imprisonment suspended for 2 years, considering the seriousness of the breaches, absence of violence, and relevant sentencing guidance.

Parties
Applicant/respondent: Helena Loughran; Respondent/appellant: Mehas Pandya
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 December 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence for Contempt of Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Non Molestation Orders, Sentencing, Harassment
Family Law Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Non Molestation Orders Sentencing Harassment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Helena Loughran

Applicant/respondent

Mehas Pandya

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence for Contempt of Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 2 years' imprisonment suspended for 2 years for contempt of court was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Appropriate length and nature of sentence for multiple breaches of non-molestation orders

Ratio Decidendi

The original sentence of 2 years' imprisonment suspended for 2 years was manifestly excessive for the breaches found. An appropriate sentence is 8 months' imprisonment suspended for 2 years, considering the seriousness of the breaches, absence of violence, and relevant sentencing guidance.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Sentence reduced to 8 months' imprisonment suspended for 2 years
  • Non-molestation order to run until further order