Ford v Ford [2003] EWCA Civ 1934 (19 December 2003)
The finding of contempt was upheld as the judge was entitled to prefer Mrs Ford's evidence, and the standard of proof was met. However, the total sentence of eight months was manifestly excessive in the circumstances and should be reduced to six months, activating the suspended sentence with no separate penalty for the further offence.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1934
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Suzanne Louise Ford; Defendant/appellant: Paul Martin Ford
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Appeal From Bournemouth County Court Judgment on Contempt of Court and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against finding of contempt dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Injunction Breach, Sentencing, Domestic Harassment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Suzanne Louise Ford
Claimant/respondent
Paul Martin Ford
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal From Bournemouth County Court Judgment on Contempt of Court and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether contempt of court was proved to the requisite standard
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The finding of contempt was upheld as the judge was entitled to prefer Mrs Ford's evidence, and the standard of proof was met. However, the total sentence of eight months was manifestly excessive in the circumstances and should be reduced to six months, activating the suspended sentence with no separate penalty for the further offence.
Court Disposition
Appeal against finding of contempt dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.
Orders
- Sentence reduced from eight months to six months' imprisonment.
- Suspended sentence activated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment