Loughran v Pandya [2005] EWCA Civ 1720 (07 December 2005)
The original sentence of 2 years' imprisonment suspended for 2 years was manifestly excessive given the nature and gravity of the breaches. An appropriate sentence is 8 months' imprisonment suspended for 2 years, with the non-molestation order to run until further order.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 1720
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Helena Loughran; Respondent/appellant: Mehas Pandya
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence for Contempt of Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced to 8 months' imprisonment suspended for 2 years; non-molestation order to run until further order.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Non Molestation Orders, Sentencing, Harassment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Helena Loughran
Applicant/respondent
Mehas Pandya
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence for Contempt of Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 2 years' imprisonment suspended for 2 years for contempt of court was manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriate length and nature of sentence for breaches of non-molestation orders
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence of 2 years' imprisonment suspended for 2 years was manifestly excessive given the nature and gravity of the breaches. An appropriate sentence is 8 months' imprisonment suspended for 2 years, with the non-molestation order to run until further order.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced to 8 months' imprisonment suspended for 2 years; non-molestation order to run until further order.
Orders
- Sentence reduced to 8 months' imprisonment suspended for 2 years
- Non-molestation order to run until further order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment