Therium (UK) Holdings Ltd v Brooke & Ors [2016] EWHC 2477 (Comm) (07 October 2016)

Therium (UK) Holdings Ltd v Brooke & Ors [2016] EWHC 2477 (Comm) (07 October 2016)

Mr. Brooke's breaches of the freezing and disclosure orders were deliberate, premeditated, and sustained, causing serious prejudice to Therium and undermining the administration of justice. The contempt is aggravated by lack of remorse and public defiance. A severe custodial sentence is necessary to punish past conduct, deter others, and coerce compliance, with limited mitigation for age and health.

Citation
[2016] EWHC 2477 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant: Therium (UK) Holdings Limited; First Defendant: Mr. Guy Brooke; Second Defendant: Ms. Emmy Ettema; Third Defendant: Cable Plus BV
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 October 2016
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Application (civil) / Sentencing After Findings of Contempt
Outcome
Concurrent sentence of 21 months' imprisonment imposed on Mr. Guy Brooke for contempt of court.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Freezing Orders, Enforcement of Court Orders, Sentencing for Contempt

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Therium (UK) Holdings Limited

Claimant

Mr. Guy Brooke

First Defendant

Ms. Emmy Ettema

Second Defendant

Cable Plus BV

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Contempt of Court Application (civil) / Sentencing After Findings of Contempt

  1. 1 Whether Mr. Guy Brooke is in contempt of court for breaching freezing and disclosure orders
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence for contempt of court in the context of deliberate and continuing breach

Ratio Decidendi

Mr. Brooke's breaches of the freezing and disclosure orders were deliberate, premeditated, and sustained, causing serious prejudice to Therium and undermining the administration of justice. The contempt is aggravated by lack of remorse and public defiance. A severe custodial sentence is necessary to punish past conduct, deter others, and coerce compliance, with limited mitigation for age and health.

Court Disposition

Concurrent sentence of 21 months' imprisonment imposed on Mr. Guy Brooke for contempt of court.

Orders

  • Mr. Guy Brooke sentenced to 21 months' imprisonment for contempt, concurrent on each finding.
  • Mr. Brooke may apply for discharge if he purges his contempt by procuring transfer of the claim proceeds into court.