Flogas Britain Ltd v Attock Metal & LPG Ltd & Anor [2018] EWHC 1415 (QB) (08 June 2018)

Flogas Britain Ltd v Attock Metal & LPG Ltd & Anor [2018] EWHC 1415 (QB) (08 June 2018)

The Defendants, having knowingly given undertakings to the Court not to fill or supply LPG in Flogas cylinders, intentionally breached those undertakings on 3 and 24 November 2017. The breaches were committed with knowledge of the order and its significance, and constitute contempt of court beyond reasonable doubt.

Citation
[2018] EWHC 1415 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Flogas Britain Limited; First Defendant: Attock Metal & LPG Limited; Second Defendant: Mohammed Hanif
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Application / Judgment on Liability, Pending Submissions on Penalty
Outcome
Defendants found in contempt of court for breach of undertakings; penalty to be determined after further submissions.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Breach of Undertaking, Injunctions, Enforcement of Court Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Flogas Britain Limited

Claimant

Attock Metal & LPG Limited

First Defendant

Mohammed Hanif

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Contempt of Court Application / Judgment on Liability, Pending Submissions on Penalty

  1. 1 Whether the Defendants breached undertakings given to the Court in 2014
  2. 2 Whether the breaches were intentional and with knowledge of the undertakings
  3. 3 Whether the Second Defendant understood the undertakings and their significance

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendants, having knowingly given undertakings to the Court not to fill or supply LPG in Flogas cylinders, intentionally breached those undertakings on 3 and 24 November 2017. The breaches were committed with knowledge of the order and its significance, and constitute contempt of court beyond reasonable doubt.

Court Disposition

Defendants found in contempt of court for breach of undertakings; penalty to be determined after further submissions.