Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL & Ors
The judgment debtors are in contempt of court for deliberate breaches of English court orders made to enforce payment of a judgment debt, including receipt of proceeds in violation of a receivership order, failure to provide information and disclosure as required, and interference with the receiver's rights. Lebanese court orders and the appointment of a judicial administrator do not excuse contempt, as these were part of a deliberate strategy to frustrate enforcement and the judgment debtors could have complied with the English orders at any time. The court retains discretion to enforce its orders despite foreign legal obstacles, especially where those obstacles are self-created.
- Parties
- Applicant/judgment Creditor: Munib Masri; First Respondent/judgment Debtor: Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL; Second Respondent/judgment Debtor: Consolidated Contractors (Oil and Gas) Company SAL; Third Respondent: Wael S Khoury
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Application (post Judgment Enforcement) / Judgment on Contempt Application Against Judgment Debtors
- Outcome
- Contempt established against judgment debtors (CCIC and CCOG) on multiple grounds; directions for further submissions on sanction.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Receivership, Freezing Orders, Cross Border Insolvency, Asset Disclosure, Conflict of Laws
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Munib Masri
Applicant/judgment Creditor
Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL
First Respondent/judgment Debtor
Consolidated Contractors (Oil and Gas) Company SAL
Second Respondent/judgment Debtor
Wael S Khoury
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application (post Judgment Enforcement) / Judgment on Contempt Application Against Judgment Debtors
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment debtors (CCIC and CCOG) are in contempt of court for breaching orders made to enforce payment of a judgment debt.
- 2 Whether the appointment of a judicial administrator and Lebanese court orders excuse non-compliance with English court orders.
- 3 Whether the judgment debtors' actions in Lebanon and elsewhere constitute a deliberate anti-enforcement strategy.
Ratio Decidendi
The judgment debtors are in contempt of court for deliberate breaches of English court orders made to enforce payment of a judgment debt, including receipt of proceeds in violation of a receivership order, failure to provide information and disclosure as required, and interference with the receiver's rights. Lebanese court orders and the appointment of a judicial administrator do not excuse contempt, as these were part of a deliberate strategy to frustrate enforcement and the judgment debtors could have complied with the English orders at any time. The court retains discretion to enforce its orders despite foreign legal obstacles, especially where those obstacles are self-created.
Court Disposition
Contempt established against judgment debtors (CCIC and CCOG) on multiple grounds; directions for further submissions on sanction.
Orders
- Findings of contempt against CCIC and CCOG for breaches of receivership, freezing, and disclosure orders.
- Directions for further submissions on appropriate sanctions (including potential fines).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment