HM Attorney General v MGN Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 2383 (Admin) (29 July 2011)
The publications by the defendants created substantial risks to the administration of justice by vilifying an arrested individual, constituting contempt of court under the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The fines reflect the gravity and aggravating features of the contempt.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2383 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Her Majesty's Attorney General; First Defendant: MGN Limited; Second Defendant: News Group Newspapers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court Proceedings / Judgment and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Defendants found in contempt of court and fined.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court by Publication, Risk to Administration of Justice, Vilification of Arrested Persons, Fines for Contempt, Apology and Mitigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Attorney General
Claimant
MGN Limited
First Defendant
News Group Newspapers Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Proceedings / Judgment and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the publications by the defendants constituted contempt of court under the Contempt of Court Act 1981
- 2 Whether the risk to the administration of justice was substantial
- 3 Appropriate penalty for contempt
Ratio Decidendi
The publications by the defendants created substantial risks to the administration of justice by vilifying an arrested individual, constituting contempt of court under the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The fines reflect the gravity and aggravating features of the contempt.
Court Disposition
Defendants found in contempt of court and fined.
Orders
- MGN Limited fined £50,000.
- News Group Newspapers Limited fined £18,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment