Matin v HM Attorney General & Anor

Matin v HM Attorney General & Anor

The President's declaration was set aside because her discretion was exercised on a mistaken factual basis regarding the child's likely involvement in contempt proceedings. The appeal was allowed and the declaration refused, as the balance of factors, with the benefit of hindsight and additional material, weighed against permitting the contempt proceedings to continue.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Matin; Defendant/appellant: Her Majesty's Attorney-General; Applicant/respondent: Michael John Pelling
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 November 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (family Division) / Appeal From High Court Decision on Declaration Regarding Contempt Proceedings
Outcome
Appeal allowed; declaration set aside; application granted
Legal Topics
Contempt Proceedings, Child Welfare, Mc Kenzie Friend, Judicial Discretion, Disclosure of Documents
Family Law Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Contempt Proceedings Child Welfare Mc Kenzie Friend Judicial Discretion Disclosure of Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Matin

Claimant/respondent

Her Majesty's Attorney-General

Defendant/appellant

Michael John Pelling

Applicant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (family Division) / Appeal From High Court Decision on Declaration Regarding Contempt Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the welfare of the child Forhad Matin precludes the institution of contempt proceedings against Dr Pelling
  2. 2 Whether the President exercised her discretion on a mistaken factual basis regarding the child's involvement
  3. 3 Whether oral evidence should have been admitted at first instance

Ratio Decidendi

The President's declaration was set aside because her discretion was exercised on a mistaken factual basis regarding the child's likely involvement in contempt proceedings. The appeal was allowed and the declaration refused, as the balance of factors, with the benefit of hindsight and additional material, weighed against permitting the contempt proceedings to continue.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; declaration set aside; application granted

Orders

  • Respondent to pay the Appellants' costs in the sum of £755
  • Further orders as per agreed minute of order