Taylor v Rive Droite Music Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 1300 (04 November 2005)
The Court held that the 1998 publishing agreement was for a term of two years, not three, based on the direct reference to duration in clause 4(a)(i) and the structure of previous agreements. The Court found Mr Taylor infringed RDM's copyright in the Iglesias songs as copyright vested in RDM under Mr Barry's agreement, and rejected the defence of implied consent. Injunctive relief was refused as the judge found no basis for ongoing risk of infringement. The Court also addressed implied terms and unlawful interference with goods, upholding the trial judge's findings.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 1300
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Mark Taylor; Defendant/appellant: Rive Droite Music Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment Following High Court Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed in part; declarations and orders varied.
- Legal Topics
- Contract Interpretation, Copyright Infringement, Rectification, Implied Terms, Injunctions, Damages, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Taylor
Claimant/respondent
Rive Droite Music Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment Following High Court Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1998 publishing agreement was for a term of two years or three years
- 2 Whether Mr Taylor infringed RDM's copyright in the versions of 'Hero' and 'Love to See You Cry' as they existed on 1 December 2000
- 3 Whether RDM is entitled to an injunction to restrain further breaches of copyright
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the 1998 publishing agreement was for a term of two years, not three, based on the direct reference to duration in clause 4(a)(i) and the structure of previous agreements. The Court found Mr Taylor infringed RDM's copyright in the Iglesias songs as copyright vested in RDM under Mr Barry's agreement, and rejected the defence of implied consent. Injunctive relief was refused as the judge found no basis for ongoing risk of infringement. The Court also addressed implied terms and unlawful interference with goods, upholding the trial judge's findings.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed in part; declarations and orders varied.
Orders
- Declaration that the 1998 publishing agreement was for a term of two years expiring on 30 November 2000
- Declaration of copyright infringement in respect of the Iglesias songs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment