NHS Commissioning Board v Silovsky [2015] EWHC 3141 (Comm) (24 September 2015)
The contract, on its proper construction, provides for a fixed annual payment of £77,238 for premises costs, with no implied term linking payments to the GMS Premises Directions. There is no evidential basis for rectification for either common or unilateral mistake.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 3141 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: NHS Commissioning Board; First Defendant: Dr Karol Silovsky
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial) / Summary Judgment Application by Defendants
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for the defendants; claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Contract Interpretation, Rectification, Summary Judgment, NHS Contracts, Mistake in Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NHS Commissioning Board
Claimant
Dr Karol Silovsky
First Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial) / Summary Judgment Application by Defendants
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2007 PMS agreement entitles the defendants to fixed annual premises payments or payments variable in accordance with the GMS Premises Directions
- 2 Whether the contract should be rectified for common or unilateral mistake
Ratio Decidendi
The contract, on its proper construction, provides for a fixed annual payment of £77,238 for premises costs, with no implied term linking payments to the GMS Premises Directions. There is no evidential basis for rectification for either common or unilateral mistake.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for the defendants; claim dismissed.
Orders
- Claim dismissed in its entirety.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment