British Gas Trading Ltd v Amerada Hess Ltd & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 900 (15 May 2006)

British Gas Trading Ltd v Amerada Hess Ltd & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 900 (15 May 2006)

The requirement in Article XIX.3(b) to 'give reasons' for the sellers' belief that continued production would no longer be economic is satisfied by stating the reason for that belief, namely the natural decline in reservoir pressure leading to production costs exceeding gross revenue. The contract does not require the notice to include detailed financial analysis or particulars. The sellers' notices were therefore valid.

Citation
[2006] EWCA Civ 900
Parties
Claimant/appellant: British Gas Trading Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Amerada Hess Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Perenco UK Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Contractual Interpretation, Termination Clauses, Notice Requirements, Gas Supply Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

British Gas Trading Ltd

Claimant/appellant

Amerada Hess Ltd

Defendant/respondent

Perenco UK Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court

  1. 1 Whether the termination notices served by the sellers under Article XIX.3(b) of the Principal Agreements were valid and complied with the contractual requirement to 'give reasons'.
  2. 2 Whether the notices needed to include detailed financial analysis or only the reason for the sellers' belief that production would become uneconomic.

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement in Article XIX.3(b) to 'give reasons' for the sellers' belief that continued production would no longer be economic is satisfied by stating the reason for that belief, namely the natural decline in reservoir pressure leading to production costs exceeding gross revenue. The contract does not require the notice to include detailed financial analysis or particulars. The sellers' notices were therefore valid.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by British Gas Trading Ltd is dismissed.