Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig (Welsh Water) v Corus UK Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 285 (30 March 2007)
Clause 17 of the Llanwern 1993 Agreement was intended to have contractual effect, entitling Corus to continued supply of water after 31 March 2004 on terms to be agreed or, failing agreement, determined by the Director under section 56 of the Water Industry Act 1991. The relevant request for supply was made before any charges scheme was introduced, so the Director retained jurisdiction to determine charges. Welsh Water could not unilaterally impose a charges scheme to override the agreed mechanism. The judge below erred in holding otherwise.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 285
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig (Welsh Water); Defendant/appellant: Corus UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment (cpr 24.2) in the High Court, Chancery Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Contractual Construction, Statutory Interpretation, Water Supply Agreements, Implied Terms, Enforceability of Agreements, Jurisdiction of Regulatory Authorities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig (Welsh Water)
Claimant/respondent
Corus UK Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment (cpr 24.2) in the High Court, Chancery Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 17 of the Llanwern 1993 Agreement had contractual effect after 31 March 2004
- 2 Whether the statutory regime under the Water Industry Act 1991 displaced or supplemented the contractual machinery for determining charges
- 3 Whether the introduction of a charges scheme by Welsh Water deprived Corus of contractual rights
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 17 of the Llanwern 1993 Agreement was intended to have contractual effect, entitling Corus to continued supply of water after 31 March 2004 on terms to be agreed or, failing agreement, determined by the Director under section 56 of the Water Industry Act 1991. The relevant request for supply was made before any charges scheme was introduced, so the Director retained jurisdiction to determine charges. Welsh Water could not unilaterally impose a charges scheme to override the agreed mechanism. The judge below erred in holding otherwise.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Summary judgment for Welsh Water set aside
- Matter remitted for determination in accordance with the contractual mechanism (Director's determination under section 56)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment