Cape Distribution Ltd v Cape Intermediate Holdings Plc [2016] EWHC 1786 (QB) (19 July 2016)
Section 7(3)(a) of the 1978 Act precludes CIH from claiming contribution against CDL where CDL is entitled to a contractual indemnity. For mesothelioma 'straddler' claims, Aviva is precluded from pursuing subrogated claims against CIH for any period where co-insurance existed, including post-25 November 1964, due to the subrogation bar. The existence of co-insurance and the pervasive connection of interests between CDL and CIH mean that Aviva cannot recover from CIH in respect of the same loss. Limitation issues are to be determined based on when claims were made or liabilities incurred, but specific findings on time-barred claims are deferred.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 1786 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant/part 20 Defendant: Cape Distribution Limited; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Cape Intermediate Holdings PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract/insurance Dispute / Post Preliminary Issues, Determination of Further Issues Before Main Trial
- Outcome
- CIH is precluded from claiming contribution against CDL under the 1978 Act due to the contractual indemnity. Aviva is precluded from pursuing subrogated claims against CIH for 'straddler' mesothelioma claims where co-insurance existed. Consequential orders on dismissal of CIH's counterclaims and limitation issues...
- Legal Topics
- Contractual Indemnity, Contribution Under Civil Liability (contribution) Act 1978, Subrogation and Co Insurance, Limitation Periods, Mesothelioma and Asbestos Claims, Compensation Act 2006, Divisible and Indivisible Disease Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cape Distribution Limited
Claimant/part 20 Defendant
Cape Intermediate Holdings PLC
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract/insurance Dispute / Post Preliminary Issues, Determination of Further Issues Before Main Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Effect of section 7(3)(a) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 on CIH's counterclaims
- 2 Whether Aviva is precluded from pursuing indemnities in 'straddler' cases (employees exposed to asbestos before and after 25 November 1964)
- 3 When limitation periods start to run for CDL's claims based on contractual indemnities and whether any claims are time-barred
Ratio Decidendi
Section 7(3)(a) of the 1978 Act precludes CIH from claiming contribution against CDL where CDL is entitled to a contractual indemnity. For mesothelioma 'straddler' claims, Aviva is precluded from pursuing subrogated claims against CIH for any period where co-insurance existed, including post-25 November 1964, due to the subrogation bar. The existence of co-insurance and the pervasive connection of interests between CDL and CIH mean that Aviva cannot recover from CIH in respect of the same loss. Limitation issues are to be determined based on when claims were made or liabilities incurred, but specific findings on time-barred claims are deferred.
Court Disposition
CIH is precluded from claiming contribution against CDL under the 1978 Act due to the contractual indemnity. Aviva is precluded from pursuing subrogated claims against CIH for 'straddler' mesothelioma claims where co-insurance existed. Consequential orders on dismissal of CIH's counterclaims and limitation issues...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment