WH Newson Holding Ltd & Ors v IMI Plc & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 773 (27 July 2016)
Section 1(4) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 precludes a Part 20 defendant from raising a limitation defence to a contribution claim where, on the pleadings at the date of settlement, the burden of proof on limitation fell on the claimant due to a positive case pleaded in reply. The court must assume that the factual basis of the claim, including the reply, could be established, and the limitation defence is not available unless it was a collateral defence with the burden on the defendant.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 773
- Parties
- Claimants: W. H. Newson Holding Limited and Others; First Defendant/part 20 Claimant/respondent: IMI PLC; Second Defendant/part 20 Claimant/respondent: IMI Kynoch Limited; Part 20 Defendant/appellant: Delta Limited (formerly Delta PLC); Part 20 Defendant/appellant: Delta Engineering Holdings Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Preliminary Issue From High Court (chancery Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contribution Between Tortfeasors, Limitation of Actions, Interpretation of Civil Liability (contribution) Act 1978 S.1(4), Follow on Damages Claims, Cartel Damages, Bona Fide Settlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W. H. Newson Holding Limited and Others
Claimants
IMI PLC
First Defendant/part 20 Claimant/respondent
IMI Kynoch Limited
Second Defendant/part 20 Claimant/respondent
Delta Limited (formerly Delta PLC)
Part 20 Defendant/appellant
Delta Engineering Holdings Limited
Part 20 Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Preliminary Issue From High Court (chancery Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 1(4) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 precludes a Part 20 defendant from raising a limitation defence to a contribution claim after a bona fide settlement of the main claim.
- 2 Whether the factual basis of the claimant's reply to a limitation defence forms part of the 'factual basis of the claim' for the purposes of s.1(4).
Ratio Decidendi
Section 1(4) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 precludes a Part 20 defendant from raising a limitation defence to a contribution claim where, on the pleadings at the date of settlement, the burden of proof on limitation fell on the claimant due to a positive case pleaded in reply. The court must assume that the factual basis of the claim, including the reply, could be established, and the limitation defence is not available unless it was a collateral defence with the burden on the defendant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that section 1(4) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 precludes Delta from arguing that the claimants' claims are time barred for the reasons set out in paragraph 18 of Delta's Amended Defence dated 16 October 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment