Luke v Kingsley Smith & Company & Ors

Luke v Kingsley Smith & Company & Ors

The court held that Kingsley Smith has a realistic prospect of success in claiming contribution from Wansbroughs and Miss Addy under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978, as the alleged combined negligence could have caused a single, indivisible loss—the lost chance to pursue the original action successfully. The applications for summary judgment by Wansbroughs and Miss Addy fail as the issue of liability for the same damage is fact-sensitive and should be determined at trial.

Parties
Claimant: William James Luke; 1st Defendant: Kingsley Smith & Company; 2nd Defendant: Wansbroughs; 3rd Defendant: Caroline Addy
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Professional Negligence / Summary Judgment Applications Under Civil Procedure Rules Part 24
Outcome
Applications for summary judgment by Wansbroughs and Miss Addy dismissed.
Legal Topics
Contribution Under Civil Liability (contribution) Act 1978, Causation, Novus Actus Interveniens, Strike Out Applications, Loss of Chance, Summary Judgment, Apportionment of Liability
Tort Professional Negligence Civil Procedure Contribution Under Civil Liability (contribution) Act 1978 Causation Novus Actus Interveniens Strike Out Applications Loss of Chance +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William James Luke

Claimant

Kingsley Smith & Company

1st Defendant

Wansbroughs

2nd Defendant

Caroline Addy

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Professional Negligence / Summary Judgment Applications Under Civil Procedure Rules Part 24

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Wansbroughs and Miss Addy are liable for the 'same damage' as Kingsley Smith under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978
  2. 2 Whether the chain of causation was broken by subsequent negligence
  3. 3 Whether the loss suffered by the claimant is single and indivisible or separate as between defendants

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Kingsley Smith has a realistic prospect of success in claiming contribution from Wansbroughs and Miss Addy under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978, as the alleged combined negligence could have caused a single, indivisible loss—the lost chance to pursue the original action successfully. The applications for summary judgment by Wansbroughs and Miss Addy fail as the issue of liability for the same damage is fact-sensitive and should be determined at trial.

Court Disposition

Applications for summary judgment by Wansbroughs and Miss Addy dismissed.

Orders

  • Stay of part 20 claims lifted.
  • Matter to proceed to trial for determination of liability and contribution.