Goodman v Keeves
The trial judge was entitled to accept the medical evidence that the closed head injury would have occurred even if a seat belt was worn, to make separate findings for different injuries, and to apportion liability as he did, taking into account the claimant's age and the availability of the seat belt.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Louise Goodman (a patient by her mother and litigation friend Shirley Bosworth); Defendant/applicant: Andrew Keeves
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Contributory Negligence, Seat Belt Defence, Apportionment of Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Louise Goodman (a patient by her mother and litigation friend Shirley Bosworth)
Claimant/respondent
Andrew Keeves
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding that the closed head injury would have occurred even if the claimant wore a seat belt
- 2 Whether the judge was correct to make separate findings for head injury and other injuries regarding contributory negligence
- 3 Whether the apportionment of liability for failure to wear a seat belt and for knowledge of the driver's intoxication was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to accept the medical evidence that the closed head injury would have occurred even if a seat belt was worn, to make separate findings for different injuries, and to apportion liability as he did, taking into account the claimant's age and the availability of the seat belt.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment