Charles Jack Lee v Parminder Singh Khraud
The judge was entitled to infer contributory negligence from the facts and reasonable probabilities, despite the absence of direct evidence, and to apportion liability with a one-third reduction in damages for the appellant, reflecting equal causative potency but greater culpability of the respondents.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mr Charles Jack Lee; Defendant/respondent: Mr Parminder Singh Khraud; Defendant/respondent: Mr Michael Fletcher; Defendant/respondent: Mr Jason Wright
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contributory Negligence, Workplace Safety, Apportionment of Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Charles Jack Lee
Claimant/appellant
Mr Parminder Singh Khraud
Defendant/respondent
Mr Michael Fletcher
Defendant/respondent
Mr Jason Wright
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was contributorily negligent in the accident.
- 2 Whether the reduction of damages by one third was justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to infer contributory negligence from the facts and reasonable probabilities, despite the absence of direct evidence, and to apportion liability with a one-third reduction in damages for the appellant, reflecting equal causative potency but greater culpability of the respondents.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The judge's finding of contributory negligence and reduction of damages by one third is upheld.
- No change to apportionment or liability.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment