Armsden v Kent Police [2009] EWCA Civ 631 (26 June 2009)
PC Purse's excessive speed without sounding the siren was negligent and a contributory cause of the accident, but Ms Cheesewright's failure to keep a proper lookout to the right when emerging onto the major road was the greater cause; liability apportioned 40% to Kent Police, 60% to Ms Cheesewright.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Civ 631
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Alan Armsden (as Executor of the Estate of Rachael Cheesewright deceased); Defendant/appellant: Kent Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Trial of Liability
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment substituted for apportionment of liability.
- Legal Topics
- Contributory Negligence, Duty of Care, Emergency Vehicle Liability, Road Traffic Accidents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Armsden (as Executor of the Estate of Rachael Cheesewright deceased)
Claimant/respondent
Kent Police
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Trial of Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether PC Purse was negligent in causing the fatal accident
- 2 Whether Ms Cheesewright was contributorily negligent
- 3 Appropriate apportionment of liability
Ratio Decidendi
PC Purse's excessive speed without sounding the siren was negligent and a contributory cause of the accident, but Ms Cheesewright's failure to keep a proper lookout to the right when emerging onto the major road was the greater cause; liability apportioned 40% to Kent Police, 60% to Ms Cheesewright.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment substituted for apportionment of liability.
Orders
- Liability apportioned 40% to Kent Police, 60% to Ms Cheesewright's estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment