Ecclestone v Khyami [2014] EWHC 29 (QB) (20 January 2014)
The Lamborghini Aventador was a gift from Ms Ecclestone to Mr Khyami, who thereby acquired title and could pledge it as security. Mr Khyami validly pledged the car to Elite, who acquired an immediate right to possession upon default. Elite's subsequent possession and sale to Ansol were not defeated by any better title or illegality on Ms Ecclestone's part. Ms Ecclestone's claim for conversion failed, and the injunction was discharged. Elite and Ansol were entitled to inquiry under the cross-undertaking in damages.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 29
- Parties
- Claimant: Tamara Ecclestone; First Defendant: Omar Khyami; Second Defendant: Elite Performance Cars Limited; Third Defendant: Ansol Trading Limited trading as Four Seasons
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Conversion and Injunction / High Court Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for conversion and delivery up by Ms Ecclestone dismissed; injunction discharged; inquiry under cross-undertaking in damages ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Conversion, Injunctions, Illegality, Ownership of Chattels, Security Interests, Damages, Cross Undertaking in Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tamara Ecclestone
Claimant
Omar Khyami
First Defendant
Elite Performance Cars Limited
Second Defendant
Ansol Trading Limited trading as Four Seasons
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Conversion and Injunction / High Court Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Lamborghini Aventador was a gift from Ms Ecclestone to Mr Khyami
- 2 Whether Mr Khyami transferred title or security interest in the car to Elite
- 3 Whether Elite transferred title in the car to Ansol
Ratio Decidendi
The Lamborghini Aventador was a gift from Ms Ecclestone to Mr Khyami, who thereby acquired title and could pledge it as security. Mr Khyami validly pledged the car to Elite, who acquired an immediate right to possession upon default. Elite's subsequent possession and sale to Ansol were not defeated by any better title or illegality on Ms Ecclestone's part. Ms Ecclestone's claim for conversion failed, and the injunction was discharged. Elite and Ansol were entitled to inquiry under the cross-undertaking in damages.
Court Disposition
Claim for conversion and delivery up by Ms Ecclestone dismissed; injunction discharged; inquiry under cross-undertaking in damages ordered.
Orders
- Ms Ecclestone's claim for conversion and delivery up dismissed
- Injunction discharged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment