Artificial Solutions Germany GmbH v Creative Virtual Ltd & Anor

Artificial Solutions Germany GmbH v Creative Virtual Ltd & Anor

Artificial did not validly terminate the Distribution Agreement because it refused to accept performance under the contract, thereby triggering creditor delay and the tu quoque principle. Creative's offers to pay were sufficient, and Artificial's denial of the contract and insistence on payment under a temporary agreement precluded valid termination for non-payment.

Parties
Claimant: Artificial Solutions Germany GmbH; First Defendant: Creative Virtual Limited; Second Defendant: Christopher Ezekiel
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Copyright Infringement, Distribution Agreements, Termination of Contract, German Law, Licensing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Artificial Solutions Germany GmbH

Claimant

Creative Virtual Limited

First Defendant

Christopher Ezekiel

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Artificial validly terminated the Distribution Agreement for non-payment
  2. 2 Whether Creative was licensed to reproduce the Lingubot software
  3. 3 Whether Artificial's refusal to accept payment constituted creditor delay under German law

Ratio Decidendi

Artificial did not validly terminate the Distribution Agreement because it refused to accept performance under the contract, thereby triggering creditor delay and the tu quoque principle. Creative's offers to pay were sufficient, and Artificial's denial of the contract and insistence on payment under a temporary agreement precluded valid termination for non-payment.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed