Artifical Solutions Germany GmbH v Creative Virtual Ltd & Anor [2007] EWHC 3185 (Ch) (12 October 2007)

Artifical Solutions Germany GmbH v Creative Virtual Ltd & Anor [2007] EWHC 3185 (Ch) (12 October 2007)

There are serious triable issues regarding the claimant's entitlement to terminate the Distribution Agreement and the application of German law doctrines. The balance of convenience weighs against granting an interim injunction, as it would irreparably harm the defendants' business, whereas the claimant's potential loss is less certain and can be compensated. The appropriate course is to continue the interim regime of payments into a joint account and reporting, and to direct a speedy trial of preliminary issues rather than grant a stay or injunction.

Citation
[2007] EWHC 3185 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Artificial Solutions Germany GmbH; First Defendant: Creative Virtual Limited; Second Defendant: Mr Ezekiel
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement Action / Interim Applications: Claimant for Interim Injunction; Defendants for Stay Pending Related Hamburg Proceedings
Outcome
Interim injunction refused; stay refused; speedy trial of preliminary issues directed; continuation of interim payment and reporting regime ordered.
Legal Topics
Copyright Infringement, Interim Injunctions, Distribution Agreements, Stay of Proceedings, Jurisdiction Under Judgments Regulation, German Contract Law
Intellectual Property Contract Copyright Infringement Interim Injunctions Distribution Agreements Stay of Proceedings Jurisdiction Under Judgments Regulation German Contract Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Artificial Solutions Germany GmbH

Claimant

Creative Virtual Limited

First Defendant

Mr Ezekiel

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Copyright Infringement Action / Interim Applications: Claimant for Interim Injunction; Defendants for Stay Pending Related Hamburg Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether interim injunction should be granted restraining alleged copyright infringement
  2. 2 Whether proceedings should be stayed pending related action in Hamburg under Article 28 of the Judgments Regulation
  3. 3 Whether claimant is bound by the Distribution Agreement

Ratio Decidendi

There are serious triable issues regarding the claimant's entitlement to terminate the Distribution Agreement and the application of German law doctrines. The balance of convenience weighs against granting an interim injunction, as it would irreparably harm the defendants' business, whereas the claimant's potential loss is less certain and can be compensated. The appropriate course is to continue the interim regime of payments into a joint account and reporting, and to direct a speedy trial of preliminary issues rather than grant a stay or injunction.

Court Disposition

Interim injunction refused; stay refused; speedy trial of preliminary issues directed; continuation of interim payment and reporting regime ordered.

Orders

  • Refusal of interim injunction sought by claimant
  • Refusal of stay sought by defendants