Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Brittens Pools Ltd & Ors [2009] EWHC 3294 (Ch) (26 November 2009)
The Master did not err in principle or exceed the bounds of discretion in ordering the Fixture Lists issue to be tried as a preliminary point and staying other issues; all relevant factors, including delay and the position of Brittens, were properly considered.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 3294 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Football Dataco Limited; Claimant/appellant: The Football Association Premier League Limited; Claimant/appellant: The Football League Limited; Claimant/appellant: The Scottish Premier League Limited; Claimant/appellant: The Scottish Football League; Claimant/appellant: PA Sport UK Limited; Defendant/respondent: Brittens Pools Limited; Defendant/respondent: Yahoo! UK Limited; Defendant/respondent: Stan James (Abingdon) Limited; Defendant/respondent: Stan James PLC; Defendant/respondent: Enet Pulse APS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Case Management Order (chancery Division, Intellectual Property) / Appeal Against Order for Preliminary Issue Trial and Stay of Other Issues
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Infringement, Database Right, Case Management, Preliminary Issues, Discretionary Appellate Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Football Dataco Limited
Claimant/appellant
The Football Association Premier League Limited
Claimant/appellant
The Football League Limited
Claimant/appellant
The Scottish Premier League Limited
Claimant/appellant
The Scottish Football League
Claimant/appellant
PA Sport UK Limited
Claimant/appellant
Brittens Pools Limited
Defendant/respondent
Yahoo! UK Limited
Defendant/respondent
Stan James (Abingdon) Limited
Defendant/respondent
Stan James PLC
Defendant/respondent
Enet Pulse APS
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Case Management Order (chancery Division, Intellectual Property) / Appeal Against Order for Preliminary Issue Trial and Stay of Other Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master erred in exercising discretion to order trial of the Fixture Lists issue as a preliminary point and stay other issues
- 2 Whether the delay and procedural consequences of the order were properly considered
- 3 Whether the financial position of a defendant (Brittens) was wrongly taken into account
Ratio Decidendi
The Master did not err in principle or exceed the bounds of discretion in ordering the Fixture Lists issue to be tried as a preliminary point and staying other issues; all relevant factors, including delay and the position of Brittens, were properly considered.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order of Master Bragge affirmed: trial of Fixture Lists issue as preliminary point; stay of other issues pending judgment on preliminary point; further directions to be given after preliminary issue if necessary
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment