Clearsprings Management Ltd v (Businesslinx Ltd & Anor [2005] EWHC 1487 (Ch) (14 July 2005)
It was not necessary to imply a term assigning copyright or granting an exclusive licence to CSM; the only terms necessary to give business efficacy were a non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free licence for CSM to use, repair, maintain, and upgrade the CMIS system for its business, with no right to sub-license.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 1487 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Clearsprings Management Limited; First Defendant: BusinessLinx Limited; Second Defendant: Mark Hargreaves
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Trial of Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- CSM has a non-exclusive, personal, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free licence to use, repair, maintain, and upgrade the CMIS system for its business, with no right to sub-license; no assignment or exclusive licence implied.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Ownership, Implied Terms, Software Development Agreements, Licensing Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clearsprings Management Limited
Claimant
BusinessLinx Limited
First Defendant
Mark Hargreaves
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial of Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to an assignment or exclusive licence of copyright in the CMIS software
- 2 Whether the claimant has a right to sub-license the CMIS software to third parties
Ratio Decidendi
It was not necessary to imply a term assigning copyright or granting an exclusive licence to CSM; the only terms necessary to give business efficacy were a non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free licence for CSM to use, repair, maintain, and upgrade the CMIS system for its business, with no right to sub-license.
Court Disposition
CSM has a non-exclusive, personal, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free licence to use, repair, maintain, and upgrade the CMIS system for its business, with no right to sub-license; no assignment or exclusive licence implied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment