Bristol Groundschool Ltd v Intelligent Data Capture Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 2145 (Ch) (02 July 2014)
Clause 7.1 of the 2001 Agreement, read with clause 3.1, means that BGS owns the copyright in all static artworks made available by IDC for inclusion in BGS's syllabus documents, regardless of whether the artworks were originally created for BGS or for third parties, except for the explicit Rolls Royce exception. Where IDC did not own the copyright (e.g., works copied from third parties), BGS does not acquire copyright, but IDC is in breach of contract and liable for damages. For 2D views of 3D models supplied by IDC, BGS owns copyright in the view, but not in the underlying 3D model unless necessary to effect the assignment.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 2145 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Bristol Groundschool Limited; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Intelligent Data Capture Limited; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Allan Graham Hugh Cownie; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Propilot Limited; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Slate-Ed Limited; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Jill Valerie Cownie; Defendant to Part 20 Claim: Alexander John Whittingham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property (chancery Division) / Trial Judgment on Preliminary and Substantive Issues, With Quantum and Some Issues Reserved for Later Determination
- Outcome
- Issues 2.1, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, and 2.8 determined in favour of BGS; IDC liable for breach of contract where it could not assign copyright; quantum and some further issues reserved for later determination.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Ownership, Contract Interpretation, Breach of Contract, Assignment of Copyright, Infringement of Copyright
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bristol Groundschool Limited
Claimant
Intelligent Data Capture Limited
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Allan Graham Hugh Cownie
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Propilot Limited
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Slate-Ed Limited
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Jill Valerie Cownie
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Alexander John Whittingham
Defendant to Part 20 Claim
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property (chancery Division) / Trial Judgment on Preliminary and Substantive Issues, With Quantum and Some Issues Reserved for Later Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of clause 7.1 of the 2001 Agreement regarding copyright ownership in static artworks
- 2 Whether static artworks first produced for third parties but later supplied to BGS are covered by clause 7.1
- 3 Whether works copied from third parties and supplied to BGS are covered by clause 7.1
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 7.1 of the 2001 Agreement, read with clause 3.1, means that BGS owns the copyright in all static artworks made available by IDC for inclusion in BGS's syllabus documents, regardless of whether the artworks were originally created for BGS or for third parties, except for the explicit Rolls Royce exception. Where IDC did not own the copyright (e.g., works copied from third parties), BGS does not acquire copyright, but IDC is in breach of contract and liable for damages. For 2D views of 3D models supplied by IDC, BGS owns copyright in the view, but not in the underlying 3D model unless necessary to effect the assignment.
Court Disposition
Issues 2.1, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, and 2.8 determined in favour of BGS; IDC liable for breach of contract where it could not assign copyright; quantum and some further issues reserved for later determination.
Orders
- Declaration that BGS owns copyright in static artworks supplied by IDC for inclusion in syllabus documents, except for the Rolls Royce exception and works where IDC did not own copyright.
- Declaration that BGS owns copyright in 2D views of 3D models supplied by IDC, but not in the underlying 3D models unless necessary to effect the assignment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment