Bristol Groundschool Ltd v Intelligent Data Capture Ltd & Ors
Clause 7.1 of the 2001 Agreement vests copyright in static artworks produced by IDC for inclusion in syllabus documents in BGS, regardless of whether the artwork was created specifically for BGS or made available for inclusion, except where IDC lacked title to assign. Implied terms required IDC to incorporate material reasonably required by BGS and not obstruct BGS's business. Directors who masterminded and directed infringing acts are jointly liable as tortfeasors. BGS's downloading of materials and issuing patches constituted breaches of good faith and copyright, but were not repudiatory and did not bar BGS's contractual claims. IDC breached contract by refusing technical support and...
- Parties
- Claimant: Bristol Groundschool Limited; First Defendant: Intelligent Data Capture Limited; Second Defendant: Allan Graham Hugh Cownie; Third Defendant: Propilot Limited; Fourth Defendant: Slate-Ed Limited; Fifth Defendant: Jill Valerie Cownie; Defendant to Part 20 Claim: Alexander John Whittingham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property / Judgment After Trial of Substantive Issues
- Outcome
- Judgment for Bristol Groundschool Limited on principal issues; IDC found in breach of contract; BGS's breaches not repudiatory; directors found jointly liable for copyright infringement.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Ownership, Contract Interpretation, Joint Tortfeasorship, Implied Terms, Breach of Contract, Repudiation, Breach of Confidence, Circumvention of Copy Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bristol Groundschool Limited
Claimant
Intelligent Data Capture Limited
First Defendant
Allan Graham Hugh Cownie
Second Defendant
Propilot Limited
Third Defendant
Slate-Ed Limited
Fourth Defendant
Jill Valerie Cownie
Fifth Defendant
Alexander John Whittingham
Defendant to Part 20 Claim
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property / Judgment After Trial of Substantive Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of copyright ownership clauses in agreements
- 2 Scope of implied terms in contract
- 3 Joint tortfeasorship liability of directors
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 7.1 of the 2001 Agreement vests copyright in static artworks produced by IDC for inclusion in syllabus documents in BGS, regardless of whether the artwork was created specifically for BGS or made available for inclusion, except where IDC lacked title to assign. Implied terms required IDC to incorporate material reasonably required by BGS and not obstruct BGS's business. Directors who masterminded and directed infringing acts are jointly liable as tortfeasors. BGS's downloading of materials and issuing patches constituted breaches of good faith and copyright, but were not repudiatory and did not bar BGS's contractual claims. IDC breached contract by refusing technical support and...
Court Disposition
Judgment for Bristol Groundschool Limited on principal issues; IDC found in breach of contract; BGS's breaches not repudiatory; directors found jointly liable for copyright infringement.
Orders
- Counsel to agree form of order reflecting rulings.
- Inquiry as to damages or account of profits for copyright infringement and breach of contract.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment