Atelier Eighty Two Ltd v Kilnworx Climbing Centre CIC & Ors
At the time the logos were created, Kilnworx, through Mr Bunting, entered into a contract with Purple Penguin for the creation of the logos, with an implied term that Kilnworx would own the copyrights. Purple Penguin held the legal interest on trust for Kilnworx. The subsequent assignment to Atelier did not defeat Kilnworx’s equitable interest, and Atelier was not a purchaser for value without notice. Therefore, Kilnworx is entitled to an assignment of the legal interest, and the defendants are not liable for infringement.
- Parties
- Claimant: Atelier Eighty Two Limited; First Defendant: Kilnworx Climbing Centre CIC; Second Defendant: Gurjinder Sandhu; Third Defendant: Kulpreet Sangha
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Copyright Infringement / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed as against the defendants; Kilnworx entitled to assignment of legal interest in copyrights.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Ownership, Implied Terms, Assignment of Copyright, Exclusive Licence, Commissioned Works, Equitable Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Atelier Eighty Two Limited
Claimant
Kilnworx Climbing Centre CIC
First Defendant
Gurjinder Sandhu
Second Defendant
Kulpreet Sangha
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Kilnworx Climbing Centre CIC owns the copyright in the logos created by Purple Penguin Design Limited
- 2 Whether Kilnworx is the beneficiary of an exclusive licence under the copyrights
- 3 Whether the defendants are liable for copyright infringement
Ratio Decidendi
At the time the logos were created, Kilnworx, through Mr Bunting, entered into a contract with Purple Penguin for the creation of the logos, with an implied term that Kilnworx would own the copyrights. Purple Penguin held the legal interest on trust for Kilnworx. The subsequent assignment to Atelier did not defeat Kilnworx’s equitable interest, and Atelier was not a purchaser for value without notice. Therefore, Kilnworx is entitled to an assignment of the legal interest, and the defendants are not liable for infringement.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed as against the defendants; Kilnworx entitled to assignment of legal interest in copyrights.
Orders
- Kilnworx is entitled to an assignment from Atelier of the legal interest in the copyrights in the logos.
- Neither of the defendants is liable for infringement of any of the copyrights through use of any of the logos.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment