Duke v The University of Salford [2013] EWHC 196 (QB) (06 February 2013)
The claim was struck out as an abuse of process because the defamatory allegations were directed at individual administrators, not the University itself, and any damage to the University's reputation was incidental; thus, no real or substantial tort was perpetrated against the University.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 196
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Dr Gary Paul Duke; Respondent/claimant: The University of Salford
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal to Strike Out Libel Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; claim struck out for Jameel abuse.
- Legal Topics
- Corporate Entities and Libel, Abuse of Process, Capacity to Sue for Libel, Jameel Abuse, Freedom of Expression
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Gary Paul Duke
Appellant/defendant
The University of Salford
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal to Strike Out Libel Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Can a university sue for libel?
- 2 Should the claim be struck out as an abuse of process under Jameel principles?
- 3 Do the words complained of refer to and defame the University or only its administrators?
Ratio Decidendi
The claim was struck out as an abuse of process because the defamatory allegations were directed at individual administrators, not the University itself, and any damage to the University's reputation was incidental; thus, no real or substantial tort was perpetrated against the University.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; claim struck out for Jameel abuse.
Orders
- Action by University of Salford struck out as abuse of process.
- No injunction granted to University.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment