Associated Newspapers Ltd v Buckingham Group Contracting Ltd (Cost Budgeting) [2022] EWHC 2767 (TCC) (02 November 2022)
The claimant's estimated costs are disproportionate to the issues in the case, even considering the likely claim value and complexity. The costs should be reduced by about 15%, with the claimant to submit a revised budget reflecting this reduction.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 2767 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Associated Newspapers Limited; Defendant / Part 20 Claimant: Buckingham Group Contracting Limited; Third Party: Amtrust Europe Limited; Fourth Party: Zurich Insurance PLC; Fifth Party: Lavenham Underwriting Limited, Sampford Underwriting Limited, GAI Indemnity Limited (Lloyds Syndicate 2468); Sixth Party: Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe SE
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (technology and Construction Court) / Costs and Case Management Conference (cost Budgeting Judgment)
- Outcome
- Claimant's costs budget to be reduced by approximately 15%. Claimant to submit a revised budget accordingly.
- Legal Topics
- Cost Budgeting, Professional Negligence, Indemnity Insurance, Differential Settlement, Remedial Works, Proportionality of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Associated Newspapers Limited
Claimant
Buckingham Group Contracting Limited
Defendant / Part 20 Claimant
Amtrust Europe Limited
Third Party
Zurich Insurance PLC
Fourth Party
Lavenham Underwriting Limited, Sampford Underwriting Limited, GAI Indemnity Limited (Lloyds Syndicate 2468)
Fifth Party
Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe SE
Sixth Party
Procedural Posture
Civil (technology and Construction Court) / Costs and Case Management Conference (cost Budgeting Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's costs budget is reasonable and proportionate
- 2 Extent of liability for alleged construction defects
- 3 Scope of indemnity under professional indemnity insurance
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's estimated costs are disproportionate to the issues in the case, even considering the likely claim value and complexity. The costs should be reduced by about 15%, with the claimant to submit a revised budget reflecting this reduction.
Court Disposition
Claimant's costs budget to be reduced by approximately 15%. Claimant to submit a revised budget accordingly.
Orders
- Claimant to return with a revised costs budget reduced by about 15%.
- Court approves the costs budgets of BGCL and the Collier Insurers as unopposed and reasonable.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment