Kattos v Prettys (A Firm) [2001] EWCA Civ 53 (22 January 2001)

Kattos v Prettys (A Firm) [2001] EWCA Civ 53 (22 January 2001)

The Court of Appeal held that the phrase 'costs of the action and the costs of this appeal' in its order was unlimited and included all costs, including those previously ordered by Judge Langan. There was no need to amend the order under the slip rule.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 53
Parties
Claimant/applicant: Maureen Kattos; Defendant/respondent: Prettys (a Firm)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 January 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application Under Slip Rule Following Settlement and Costs Dispute
Outcome
Application granted; no amendment to order required; applicant awarded costs of the application.
Legal Topics
Costs, Settlement, Slip Rule, Interpretation of Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maureen Kattos

Claimant/applicant

Prettys (a Firm)

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application Under Slip Rule Following Settlement and Costs Dispute

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal's order entitled the claimant to recover costs of hearings before Deputy District Judge Watkins and His Honour Judge Langan QC
  2. 2 Whether the order required amendment under the slip rule (CPR Part 40.12)

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the phrase 'costs of the action and the costs of this appeal' in its order was unlimited and included all costs, including those previously ordered by Judge Langan. There was no need to amend the order under the slip rule.

Court Disposition

Application granted; no amendment to order required; applicant awarded costs of the application.

Orders

  • No amendment to the order under Part 40.12 required.
  • Applicant to have her costs of the application.