Kattos v Prettys (A Firm) [2001] EWCA Civ 53 (22 January 2001)
The Court of Appeal held that the phrase 'costs of the action and the costs of this appeal' in its order was unlimited and included all costs, including those previously ordered by Judge Langan. There was no need to amend the order under the slip rule.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 53
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Maureen Kattos; Defendant/respondent: Prettys (a Firm)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application Under Slip Rule Following Settlement and Costs Dispute
- Outcome
- Application granted; no amendment to order required; applicant awarded costs of the application.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Settlement, Slip Rule, Interpretation of Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maureen Kattos
Claimant/applicant
Prettys (a Firm)
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application Under Slip Rule Following Settlement and Costs Dispute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal's order entitled the claimant to recover costs of hearings before Deputy District Judge Watkins and His Honour Judge Langan QC
- 2 Whether the order required amendment under the slip rule (CPR Part 40.12)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the phrase 'costs of the action and the costs of this appeal' in its order was unlimited and included all costs, including those previously ordered by Judge Langan. There was no need to amend the order under the slip rule.
Court Disposition
Application granted; no amendment to order required; applicant awarded costs of the application.
Orders
- No amendment to the order under Part 40.12 required.
- Applicant to have her costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment