Poole v Arcot Hall Golf Club [2002] EWCA Civ 985 (20 June 2002)
The judge had discretion to award costs to the respondents, who were entitled to attend the hearing given the orders made. The assessment of £3,500 was not shown to be disproportionate or inappropriate. There was no realistic prospect of a successful appeal against the costs order.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 985
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Barry Poole; Defendant/respondent: Arcot Hall Golf Club
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Permission to Appeal, Pre Action Discovery, Defamation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barry Poole
Claimant/applicant
Arcot Hall Golf Club
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in awarding costs against the applicant for the respondents' attendance at a permission to appeal hearing
- 2 Whether the costs awarded were disproportionate or unnecessary
- 3 Whether the respondents were entitled to be present at the hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The judge had discretion to award costs to the respondents, who were entitled to attend the hearing given the orders made. The assessment of £3,500 was not shown to be disproportionate or inappropriate. There was no realistic prospect of a successful appeal against the costs order.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
- Applicant to pay costs as previously ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment