P & O Nedlloyd BV v Utaniko Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 174 (19 February 2003)
CPR 36.21 does not entitle respondents to indemnity costs of the appeal as no Part 36 offer was made in appeal proceedings; standard costs apply absent special circumstances or conduct.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 174
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: P & O Nedlloyd B V; Claimant/respondent: Utaniko Limited; Defendant/appellant: Dampskibsselskabet AF, 1912 Aktieselskab; Defendant/appellant: Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg; Claimant/respondent: East West Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination Following Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Respondents awarded costs of the appeal on a standard basis; respondents to pay costs of the hearing on 12 February.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Part 36 Offers, Indemnity Costs, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P & O Nedlloyd B V
Defendant/appellant
Utaniko Limited
Claimant/respondent
Dampskibsselskabet AF, 1912 Aktieselskab
Defendant/appellant
Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg
Defendant/appellant
East West Corporation
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination Following Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents are entitled to indemnity costs of the appeal under CPR 36.21 or CPR 44.3
- 2 Interpretation of CPR 36.21 regarding Part 36 offers in appeal proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
CPR 36.21 does not entitle respondents to indemnity costs of the appeal as no Part 36 offer was made in appeal proceedings; standard costs apply absent special circumstances or conduct.
Court Disposition
Respondents awarded costs of the appeal on a standard basis; respondents to pay costs of the hearing on 12 February.
Orders
- Respondents to have their costs of the appeal on a standard basis, set off against other costs of the appeal.
- Respondents to pay costs of the hearing on 12 February.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment