Wills & Ors v Crown Estate Commissioners & Ors [2003] EWHC 1952 (Ch) (30 July 2003)

Wills & Ors v Crown Estate Commissioners & Ors [2003] EWHC 1952 (Ch) (30 July 2003)

Both sides won and lost on different points; the appeal was disproportionate to the sums involved; therefore, no order as to costs is appropriate.

Citation
[2003] EWHC 1952 (Ch)
Parties
Respondent/applicant: Robin Lionel Wills; Respondent/applicant: John Keith Wykeham Marr; Respondent/applicant: Eileen Patricia Marr; Respondent/applicant: Roderick Alistair Burden; Respondent/applicant: Wolsley House Flats Limited; Appellant/respondent: The Crown Estate Commissioners; Appellant/respondent: George Dennis Barrett; Appellant/respondent: Susan Jane Barrett; Appellant/respondent: Paul Walker
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Costs Following Appeal
Outcome
No order as to costs on the appeal.
Legal Topics
Costs, Appeal Procedure
Civil Procedure Costs Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robin Lionel Wills

Respondent/applicant

John Keith Wykeham Marr

Respondent/applicant

Eileen Patricia Marr

Respondent/applicant

Roderick Alistair Burden

Respondent/applicant

Wolsley House Flats Limited

Respondent/applicant

The Crown Estate Commissioners

Appellant/respondent

George Dennis Barrett

Appellant/respondent

Susan Jane Barrett

Appellant/respondent

Paul Walker

Appellant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Costs Following Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether either party should be awarded costs of the appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Both sides won and lost on different points; the appeal was disproportionate to the sums involved; therefore, no order as to costs is appropriate.

Court Disposition

No order as to costs on the appeal.

Orders

  • No order as to costs on the appeal.