Wiltshire v Powell & Ors [2004] EWCA Civ 626 (07 May 2004)
The appellant's failure to bring all relevant parties before the court in the first instance led to the necessity of the second action, and there was no justification to depart from the usual order for costs against the unsuccessful appellant.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 626
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Timothy Wiltshire; Respondent/defendant: Michael Powell; Respondent/defendant: Paul Etherington; Respondent/defendant: Derek Heapy; Respondent/defendant: Peter Storey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Costs Judgment Following Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as to costs; application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeals, Joinder of Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Timothy Wiltshire
Appellant/claimant
Michael Powell
Respondent/defendant
Paul Etherington
Respondent/defendant
Derek Heapy
Respondent/defendant
Peter Storey
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Costs Judgment Following Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second, third, and fourth respondents should be awarded their costs on the appeal
- 2 Whether leave to appeal to the House of Lords should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's failure to bring all relevant parties before the court in the first instance led to the necessity of the second action, and there was no justification to depart from the usual order for costs against the unsuccessful appellant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as to costs; application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Appellant to pay the costs of the second, third, and fourth respondents on the appeal
- Application for leave to appeal to the House of Lords refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment