ID & Ors v Home Office & Anor [2005] EWCA Civ 296 (04 March 2005)
The appellants won on the main issue of the appeal; therefore, no deduction from costs is appropriate.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 296
- Parties
- Claimants/appellants: ID and Others; Defendants/respondents: Home Office and Another
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; no deduction from costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeal, Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
ID and Others
Claimants/appellants
Home Office and Another
Defendants/respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be deducted given the outcome of the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants won on the main issue of the appeal; therefore, no deduction from costs is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; no deduction from costs.
Orders
- Costs here and below.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment