Infiniteland Ltd v Artisan Contracting Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 791 (23 June 2005)
The respondents were the overall winners of the appeal, and the appellants' refusal of a reasonable settlement offer justified an order for costs against them on the standard basis. No issue-based or indemnity costs order was warranted given the circumstances.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 791
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Infiniteland Limited; Claimant/appellant: John Stewart Aviss; Defendant/respondent: Artisan Contracting Limited; Defendant/respondent: Artisan (UK) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Costs Following Dismissal of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal to House of Lords refused; costs order made against appellants.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeal, Settlement Offers, Breach of Warranty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Infiniteland Limited
Claimant/appellant
John Stewart Aviss
Claimant/appellant
Artisan Contracting Limited
Defendant/respondent
Artisan (UK) Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Costs Following Dismissal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellants should pay respondents' costs of the appeal
- 2 Whether any issue-based or indemnity costs order should be made
- 3 Effect of settlement offer on costs
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents were the overall winners of the appeal, and the appellants' refusal of a reasonable settlement offer justified an order for costs against them on the standard basis. No issue-based or indemnity costs order was warranted given the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal to House of Lords refused; costs order made against appellants.
Orders
- Appellants to pay respondents' costs of the appeal on the standard basis, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
- £75,000 of monies in court to be paid to respondents on account of costs; balance remains as security.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment